EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 196 (2025) BSGF - Earth Sci. Bull., 196 (2025) 2 References
Open Access
Issue
BSGF - Earth Sci. Bull.
Volume 196, 2025
Article Number 2
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/bsgf/2024029
Published online 21 March 2025
  • Arrowsmith CA, Counihan AW, McGreevy D. 2005. Development of a multi-scaled virtual field trip for the teaching and learning of geospatial science. Int J Educ Dev Using Inf Commun Technol 1.http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle.php?id=29. (last consult: 2023/12). [Google Scholar]
  • Barféty J, Gidon M, Lemoine M, Mouterde R. 1979. Liassic syn-sedimentary tectonics in the crystalline massifs, external zone of the Frenc Western Alps − Col d’Ornon Fault. Comptes Rendus Hebd. Séances Académie Sci Sér D 289 : 1207–1210. [Google Scholar]
  • Bessin Z, Jaud M, Letortu P, Vassilakis E, Evelpidou N, Costa S, Delacourt C. 2023. Smartphone structure-from-motion photogrammetry from a boat for Coastal Cliff Face monitoring compared with pléiades tri-stereoscopic imagery and unmanned aerial system imagery. Remote Sens 15: 3824. [Google Scholar]
  • Bonali F, Russo E, Vitello F, Antoniou V, Marchese F, Fallati L, Bracchi V, Corti N, Savini A, Whitworth M, Drymoni K, Mariotto F, Nomikou P, Sciacca E, Bressan S, Falsaperla S, Reitano D, Van Wyk De Vries B, Krokos M, Panieri G, Stiller-Reeve M, Vizzari G, Becciani U, Tibaldi A. 2021. How academics and the public experienced immersive virtual reality for geo-education. Geosciences 12: 9. [Google Scholar]
  • Buckley S, Howell J, Naumann N, Lewis C, Ringdal K, Vanbiervliet J, Tong B, Maxwell G, Chmielewska M. 2021. V3Geo: a cloud-based platform for sharing virtual 3D models in geoscience (other). pico. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-13042 [Google Scholar]
  • Chiarella D, Vurro G. 2020. Fieldwork and disability: an overview for an inclusive experience. Geol Mag 157: 1933–1938. [Google Scholar]
  • Cliffe AD. 2017. A review of the benefits and drawbacks to virtual field guides in today’s Geoscience higher education environment. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 14: 28. [Google Scholar]
  • De Paz-Álvarez MI, Blenkinsop TG, Buchs DM, Gibbons GE, Cherns L. 2022. Virtual field trip to the Esla Nappe (Cantabrian Zone, NW Spain): delivering traditional geological mapping skills remotely using real data. Solid Earth 13: 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  • Eltner A, Kaiser A, Castillo C, Rock G, Neugirg F, Abellán A. 2016. Image-based surface reconstruction in geomorphometry − merits, limits and developments. Earth Surf Dyn 4: 359–389. [Google Scholar]
  • Firomumwe T. 2022. Exploring the opportunities of Virtual Fieldwork in teaching geography during COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Geogr Educ 76–87. [Google Scholar]
  • Giles S, Jackson C, Stephen N. 2020. Barriers to fieldwork in undergraduate geoscience degrees. Nat Rev Earth Environ 1: 77–78. [Google Scholar]
  • Hagge P. 2021. Student perceptions of semester-long in-class virtual reality: effectively using “Google Earth VR” in a higher education classroom. J Geogr High Educ 45: 342–360. [Google Scholar]
  • Harknett J, Whitworth M, Rust D, Krokos M, Kearl M, Tibaldi A, Bonali FL, Van Wyk De Vries B, Antoniou V, Nomikou P, Reitano D, Falsaperla S, Vitello F, Becciani U. 2022. The use of immersive virtual reality for teaching fieldwork skills in complex structural terrains. J Struct Geol 163: 104681. [Google Scholar]
  • Horota RK, Rossa P, Marques A, Gonzaga L, Senger K, Cazarin CL, Spigolon A, Veronez MR. 2023. An immersive virtual field experience structuring method for geoscience education. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 16: 121–132. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • IGN. 2023. LIDAR HD − version 1.0 − Nuages de points LiDAR − Descriptif de contenu. [Google Scholar]
  • Jaud M, Bertin S, Beauverger M, Augereau E, Delacourt C. 2020. RTK GNSS-assisted terrestrial SfM photogrammetry without GCP: application to coastal morphodynamics monitoring. Remote Sens 12: 1889. [Google Scholar]
  • Lastilla L, Ravanelli R, Crespi M. 2020. First test of agisoft metashape satellite image processing for DSM generation: a case study in Trento with Pléiades Imagery, in: IGARSS 2020 –2020 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IEEE, Waikoloa, HI, USA, pp. 897–900. [Google Scholar]
  • Lemoine M, Graciansky, PC de, Tricart P. 2000. De l’océan à la chaîne de montagnes: tectonique des plaques dans les Alpes, Collection Géosciences. Gordon and Breach science publ, [Lausanne] Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Lukacevic F, Skec S, Perisic MM, Horvat N, Storga M. 2020. Spatial perception of 3D CAD model dimensions and affordances in virtual environments. IEEE Access 8: 174587–174604. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Monet J, Greene T. 2012. Using google earth and satellite imagery to foster place-based teaching in an introductory physical geology course. J Geosci Educ 60: 10–20. [Google Scholar]
  • Omieno KK, Wabwoba F, Matoke N. 2013. Virtual reality in education: trends and issues. Int J Comput Technol 4: 38–43. [Google Scholar]
  • Peace AL, Gabriel JJ, Eyles C. 2021. Geoscience fieldwork in the age of COVID-19 and beyond: commentary on the development of a virtual geological field trip to whitefish falls, Ontario, Canada. Geosciences 11: 489. [Google Scholar]
  • Stott T, Nuttall A-M., McCloskey J. 2009. Design, development and student evaluation of a Virtual Alps Field Guide. Planet 22: 64–71. [Google Scholar]
  • Tonkin T, Midgley N. 2016. Ground-control networks for image based surface reconstruction: an investigation of optimum survey designs using UAV derived imagery and structure-from-motion photogrammetry. Remote Sens 8: 786. [Google Scholar]
  • Wang J, Ni H, Rui Y, Cui C, Cheng L. 2016. A WebGIS-based teaching assistant system for geography field practice (TASGFP): geography field practice teaching assistant system. Br J Educ Technol 47: 279–293. [Google Scholar]
  • Wright PN, Whitworth M, Tibaldi A, Bonali F, Nomikou P, AntoniouV, Vitello F, Becciani U, Krokos M, Van Wyk De VriesB. 2023. Student evaluations of using virtual reality to investigate natural hazard field sites. J Geogr High Educ 47: 311–329. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.