Issue
BSGF - Earth Sci. Bull.
Volume 192, 2021
Special Issue Gearcheology
Article Number 6
Number of page(s) 13
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/bsgf/2021003
Published online 12 March 2021
  • Antolín F, Steiner BL, Akeret Ö, Brombacher C, Kühn M, Vandorpe P, et al. 2017a. Studying the preservation of plant macroremains from waterlogged archaeological deposits for an assessment of layer taphonomy. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 246: 120–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2017.06.010. [Google Scholar]
  • Antolín F, Steiner BL, Jacomet S. 2017b. The bigger the better? On sample volume and the representativeness of archaeobotanical data in waterlogged deposits. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 12: 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.02.008. [Google Scholar]
  • Behre K-E, Jacomet S. 1991. The ecological interpretation of archaeobotanical data. In: van Zeist W, Wasylikowa K, Behre K-E, eds. Progress in Old World palaeoethnobotany, a retrospective view on the occasion of 20 years of the International Work Group for Palaeoethobotany. Rotterdam-Brookfield: Balkema, pp. 81–108. [Google Scholar]
  • Beijerinck W. 1976. Zadenatlas der Nederlandsche Flora, Ten Behoeve van de Botanie, Palaeontologie, Bodemcultuur en Warenkennis, omvattende, naasr de inheemsche flora, onze Belangrijkste cultuurgewassen en verschillende adventiefsoorten. Amsterdam: Backhuys et Meesters. [Google Scholar]
  • Berger J-F, Salvador P-G, Franc O, Vérot-Bourrély A, Bravard J-P. 2008. La chronologie fluviale postglaciaire du haut bassin rhodanien. Collection EDYTEM. Cahiers de géographie 6(1): 117–144. https://doi.org/10.3406/edyte.2008.1034. [Google Scholar]
  • Berggren G. 1969. Atlas of seeds and small fruits of Northwest-European plant species (Sweden, Norway, Denmark, east Fennoscandia and Iceland) with morphological descriptions. Part 2, Cyperaceae. Stockolm: Swedish Museum of Natural History Berlings, Arlöv. [Google Scholar]
  • Birks HJB. 2014. Challenges in the presentation and analysis of plant-macrofossil stratigraphical data. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 23(3): 309–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-013-0430-2. [Google Scholar]
  • Blaauw M. 2010. R-Code for “classical” age-modelling (CLAM V1.0) of radiocarbon sequences. Quaternary Geochronology: 512–518. [Google Scholar]
  • Bleicher N, Antolín F, Heiri O, Häberle S, Plogmann HH, Jacomet S, et al. 2018. Middens, currents and shorelines: Complex depositional processes of waterlogged prehistoric lakeside settlements based on the example of Zurich-Parkhaus Opéra (Switzerland). Journal of Archaeological Science 97: 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2018.06.010. [Google Scholar]
  • Bleicher N, Schubert C. 2015. Why are they still there? A model of accumulation and decay of organic prehistoric cultural deposits. Journal of Archaeological Science 61: 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2015.06.010. [Google Scholar]
  • Bos JAA, van Geel B, Groenewoudt BJ, Lauwerier RCGM. 2006. Early Holocene environmental change, the presence and disappearance of early Mesolithic habitation near Zutphen (The Netherlands). Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 15(1): 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-004-0056-5. [Google Scholar]
  • Bourquin-Mignot C, Brochier J-E, Chabal L, Crozat S, Fabre L, Guibal F, et al. 1999. La botanique. Paris: Editions Errance. [Google Scholar]
  • Cappers RTJ, Bekker RM, Jans JEA. 2006. Digitale Zadenatlas van Nederland [Digital seed Atlas of the Netherland]. Groningen: Barkuis publishing, Groningen university library. [Google Scholar]
  • Dietsch M-F. 1997. Milieux humides pré- et protohistorique dans le Bassin Parisien : l’étude des diaspores. Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Paris X. [Google Scholar]
  • Eide W, Birks HH, Bigelow N, Peglar SM, Birks HJB. 2006. Holocene forest development along the Setesdal valley, southern Norway, reconstructed from macrofossil and pollen evidence. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 15(2): 65–85. [Google Scholar]
  • Ellenberg H. 1992. Indicator values of the vascular plants. In: Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Düll R, Wirth B, Werner W, Paulissen D, eds. Indicator values of plants in Central Europe. Goltze Verlag, pp. 9–160. [Google Scholar]
  • Ferguson DK. 1995. Plant part processing and community reconstruction. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetica 88(3): 627–641. https://doi.org/10.5169/seals-167691. [Google Scholar]
  • Ferguson DK. 1996. Actuopalaeobotany – ataphonomic peep-show? – Summary of workshop discussions. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Abhandlungen 202(2): 149–158. [Google Scholar]
  • Gauthier E, Bichet V, Massa C, Petit C, Vannière B, Richard H. 2010. Pollen and non-pollen palynomorph evidence of medieval farming activities in southwestern Greenland. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 19(5): 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-010-0251-5. [Google Scholar]
  • Gee CT, Sander PM. 1997. The occurrence of carpofloras in coarse sand fluvial deposits: comparison of fossil and recent case studies. Medelingen Nederlands Instituut voor Toegepaste Geowetenschappen 58: 171–178. [Google Scholar]
  • Holyoak DT. 1984. Taphonomy of perspective plant macrofossils in a river catchment on Spitsbergen. New Phytologist 98(2): 405–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1984.tb02750.x. [Google Scholar]
  • Julve P. 1998. Baseflor. Index botanique, écologique et chorologique de la flore de France. Version 1998. http://perso.wanadoo.fr/philippe.julve/catminat.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • Kroll H. 1988. [Das Allerletzte]. Cenococcum geophilum. Archäologische Informationen 11(1): 111–111. [Google Scholar]
  • Lebreton V, Thery-Parisot I, Bouby L, Chrzavzez J, Delhon C, Ruas M-P. 2017. Archéobotanique et taphonomie. In: TaphonomieS. Ouvrage du Groupement de recherches 3591 “Taphonomie, Environnement et Archéologie” CNRS-INEE. Paris: Editions des archives contemporaines, pp. 291–328. [Google Scholar]
  • Lefèvre D, Heim J, Gilot E, Mouthon J. 1993. Evolution des environnements sédimentaires et biologiques à l’Holocène dans la plaine alluviale de la Meuse (Ardennes, France). Premiers résultats. Quaternaire 4(1): 17–30. https://doi.org/10.3406/quate.1993.1987. [Google Scholar]
  • Lundström-Baudais K, van Zeist W, Casparie WA. 1983. Interpretation of macroplant remains from a Neolithic lakeshore site in France. In: Papers and abstracts, VI. Symposium. International Work Group for Palaeoethnobotany, 30 May–3 June 1983, Groningen, pp. 131–131. [Google Scholar]
  • Marinval-Vigne M-C, Mordant D, Auboire G, Augereau A, Bailon S, Dauphin C, et al. 1989. Noyens-sur-Seine, site stratifié en milieu fluviatile : une étude multidisciplinaire intégrée. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française 86(10): 370–379: https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.1989.9894. [Google Scholar]
  • Martín-Closas C, Gomez B. 2004. Taphonomie des plantes et interprétations paléoécologiques. Une synthèse. Geobios 37(1): 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geobios.2003.01.006. [Google Scholar]
  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, et al. 2019. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. Available from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. [Google Scholar]
  • Pétrequin A-M, Pétrequin P. 1984. La fossilisation des vestiges et le modèle archéologique. In: Pétrequin A-M, Pétrequin P, eds. Habitat lacustre du Bénin, une approche ethnoarchéologique. Paris: Éditions recherche sur les civilisations, pp. 111–134. [Google Scholar]
  • Pradat B. 2015. Le comptage des céréales et des légumineuses en carpologie : recensement des méthodes utilisées en France et essais comparatifs sur des assemblages archéobotaniques. ArchéoSciences 39: 51–68. https://doi.org/10.4000/archeosciences.4382. [Google Scholar]
  • Ramsey CB. 2017. Methods for Summarizing Radiocarbon Datasets. Radiocarbon Cambridge University Press 59(6): 1809–1833. https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC2017.108. [Google Scholar]
  • Reimer PJ, Bard E, Bayliss A, Beck JW, Blackwell PG, Ramsey CB, et al. 2013. INTCAL13 and MARINE13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50 000 years cal. BP. Radiocarbon 55(4): 1869–1887. [Google Scholar]
  • Rettallack G. 1981. Fossil soils Indicators of ancient terrestrial environments. In: Niklas KJ, ed. Paleobotany, Paleoecology and Evolution. New York: Praeger Publishers, pp. 55–103. [Google Scholar]
  • Schaal C. 2000. Étude carpologique d’un village du Clairvaux ancien: la station 19 de Chalain (Jura, France). Mémoire de Maîtrise, Besançon, Université de Franche-Comté. [Google Scholar]
  • Schaal C. 2019a. dat@OSU: AGAM: base de données de carpologie, archaeobotany database. Chrono-environnement. FR-18008901306731-2018-02-20. Available from https://dataosu.obs-besancon.fr/FR-18008901306731-2018-02-20_AGAM-archaeobotany-database.html. [Google Scholar]
  • Schaal C. 2019b. Approche paléoécologique des paysages anciens en contexte fluvial. L’apport de la carpologie. Thèse de Doctorat, Besançon, Université de Bourgogne-Franche-Comté. Available from https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02747373. [Google Scholar]
  • Schaal C, Naton H-G, Ruffaldi P, Granai S, Jamet G, Brun O, et al. 2020. Palaeoecological response to Greenlandian (Early Holocene) climatic changes: Insight from an abandoned-channel sequence of the Meuse River at Autrecourt-et-Pourron (Ardennes, France). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 557: 109937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2020.109937. [Google Scholar]
  • Schaal C, Pétrequin P. 2016. Approche archéobotanique des villages N.M.B. de Clairvaux. In: Pétrequin A-M, Pétrequin P, eds. Les sites littoraux de Clairvaux (Jura) et le Néolithique Moyen Bourguignon Volume II. Besançon: Presse Universitaires de Franche-Comté, Centre de Recherche Archéologique de la Vallée de l’Ain, pp. 1193–1277. [Google Scholar]
  • Steiner BL, Akeret Ö, Antolín F, Brombacher C, Vandorpe P, Jacomet S. 2018. Layers rich in aquatic and wetland plants within complex anthropogenic stratigraphies and their contribution to disentangling taphonomic processes. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 27(1): 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-017-0613-3. [Google Scholar]
  • Tomlinson P. 1985. An aid to the identification of fossil buds, bud-scales and catkin-bracts of British trees and shrubs. Circaea The Journal of the Association for Environmental Archaeology 3(2): 45–130. [Google Scholar]
  • van Geel B, Aptroot A. 2006. Fossil ascomycetes in Quaternary deposits. Nova Hedwigia 82(3): 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1127/0029-5035/2006/0082-0313. [Google Scholar]
  • van Geel B, Bregman R, van der Molen PC, Dupont LM, van Driel-Murray C. 1989. Holocene raised bog deposits in the Netherlands as geochemical archives of prehistoric aerosols. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 38: 467–476. [Google Scholar]
  • Walker MJC, Coope GR, Sheldrick C, Turney CSM, Lowe JJ, Blockley SPE, et al. 2003. Devensian Lateglacial environmental changes in Britain: a multi-proxy environmental record from Llanilid, South Wales, UK. Quaternary Science Reviews 22(5-7): 475–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(02)00247-0. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.