Open Access
Numéro
BSGF - Earth Sci. Bull.
Volume 191, 2020
Numéro d'article 6
Nombre de pages 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/bsgf/2020003
Publié en ligne 6 mars 2020

© J. Aller et al., Published by EDP Sciences 2020

Licence Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1 Introduction

Kink bands are strongly asymmetric angular or sub-angular folds, whose geometry is that of a monoclinal step (Fig. 1). Although they have been described in diverse lithologies, kink bands typically develop in laminated materials (mainly shale, slates or schist) with a previous well-marked anisotropy (usually slaty cleavage or schistosity). The bands are usually the short limb of the fold; in fact, the term “kink band” refers strictly to the band, while “kink fold” refers to the whole fold. However, the term “kink band” has been generalized to refer indistinctly to the band or to the whole fold. Most authors admit that the kink bands are late structures in the orogenic evolution (e.g. Ramsay, 1962; Anderson, 1964, Anderson, 19691969; Sharma and Bhola, 2005; Misra and Burg, 2012). Anderson (1964) defined two angles, α and β, for the geometrical analysis of kink bands; these angles were named φ and φK, respectively, by Paterson and Weiss (1966), which is the terminology used here (Fig. 1). The rotation angle of the folia ψ with respect to their initial orientation is also considered here in the analysis; when there is no rotation outside the kink band, ψ = 180°−φK−φ.

Kink bands can be reproduced experimentally fairly easily, both in rocks (Paterson and Weiss, 1962, 1966; Donath, 1964, 1968, 1969; Anderson, 1974) and in other materials, e.g. in stacks of cards (Weiss, 1969; Gay and Weiss, 1974; Pulgar, 1980; Hunt et al., 2000; Wadee et al., 2004), plasticine (Cobbold et al., 1971; Price and Cosgrove, 1990), rubber layers (Honea and Johnson, 1976; Ramberg and Johnson, 1976; Reches and Johnson, 1976) or layers of lead separated by layers of wax-impregnated cloth (Stewart and Alvarez, 1991). The observations and data provided by theoretical, experimental and field studies of kink bands have given rise to several interpretations of their evolution, which have been a source of controversy as yet unresolved. Different kinematical mechanisms proposed for the evolution of kink bands are as follows:

  • slip between folia and their rotation (e.g. Donath, 1969; Bhattacharya, 1977; Sharma and Bhola, 2005; Dunham et al., 2011). This involves an evolution of the kink bands by rotation of the folia, whose length remains constant; the orientation of the kink planes also remains constant (cf. rotation shear, Bastida et al., 2018). The hinges are linked to the same material points during the process, which involves slip along the folia inside the band, and a change in thickness of the kink band, the band thickness being maximum when φK = 90° and equal to the initial thickness when φK = φ (no finite area change). The evolution of the kink band ceases when this equality is reached;

  • hinge migration (Paterson and Weiss, 1966; Weiss, 1969). This involves a first stage with the generation of a small core or a very thin kink band oblique to the foliation. This core evolves as its boundaries migrate, giving rise to an increase in the thickness of the band without a change in the orientation of the folia inside it. The equality φK = φ is maintained during the kinking, so that the orientation of the kink planes does not change, although their position changes. The evolution of kink bands by this mechanism can give rise to chevron folds that will first appear in the band intersections. Subsequently, the widening of the bands by hinge migration can result in the kink bands being replaced by chevron folds;

  • rotation of the kink planes combined with band widening (Rondeel, 1969a, 1969b; Weiss, 1980; Stewart and Alvarez, 1991). Unlike the previous mechanisms, this implies a shift in the orientation of the band as the deformation progresses. According to Weiss (1980), this mechanism is dominant when the rotation angle of the folia (ψ = 180°−φK−φ) is less than 60°, while when this angle exceeds 60°, the mechanism of hinge migration becomes dominant;

  • simple shear (Johnson, 1956; Ramsay, 1962; Dewey, 1965). This involves rotation and longitudinal strain of the folia inside the band. In this case, the structure can be considered as a ductile fault. This mechanism involves that the kink planes form an angle < 45° with the direction of the maximum compressive stress (σ1). Nonetheless, in most cases this angle is > 45°; hence, this mechanism is generally not accepted.

Each of these mechanisms should result in a characteristic deformation history, and a number of criteria have been described to discriminate between them. The inequality between the angles φ and φK, which is found in most cases, and the corresponding volume change, have been used as a criterion to discard the hinge-migration mechanism (e. g. Dewey, 1969; Bhattacharya, 1977; Sharma and Bhola, 2005) and to infer rotation of the foliation (Anderson, 1964; Ramsay, 1967). Stewart and Alvarez (1991) have criticized this view, because in general they find that φ ≠ φK in their experiments with cards, in which the existence of a widening of the kink bands during their development is shown. However, this interpretation should be taken with caution, since in at least one of their experiments (Fig. 9 of these authors), there is a strong rotation of folia within the bands while the hinge migrates. The coexistence of kink bands and chevron folds formed from the intersection of conjugate kink bands has been interpreted by these authors as evidence of the hinge-migration mechanism. Likewise, the coexistence of small cores of kink bands and more developed bands suggests a mechanism of band widening. The model with a combination of hinge migration and kink plane rotation involves the existence in an outcrop of kink planes with different orientations that depend on the degree of evolution.

The aim of this study is to contribute to the knowledge of the mechanisms that lead to the development of compressional kink bands by analyzing the excellent examples that occur in three areas located in the Westernasturian-Leonese Zone (Iberian Variscan belt) (Fig. 2). In addition, a geometrical analysis is carried out in order to explain the properties of the deformation involved in the formation of these structures.

thumbnail Fig. 1

Sinistral kink band with indication of some parameters used in the analysis of structures of this type; KP, kink planes (near Grandas de Salime, Asturias, Spain).

thumbnail Fig. 2

Geological map of the Veriscan belt in NW Spain with the location of the three studied areas in the Navia-Alto Sil slate belt.

2 Kink bands in the Navia-Alto Sil slate belt (Westernasturian-Leonese Zone)

2.1 Geological setting

The Westernasturian-Leonese Zone is one of major zones of the Iberian Variscan Belt in NW Iberia (Fig. 2). It mainly consists of a thick lower Paleozoic succession, mostly siliciclastic with the exception of a lower-middle Cambrian carbonate formation, and represents the hinterland of the orogen in the transition zone to the foreland fold and thrust belt (Cantabrian Zone) located to the east, in the core of the arc described by the general trend of the structures (Ibero-Armorican Arc). The orogenic metamorphic grade increases westward up to the amphibolite facies and granitoid outcrops occupy a large area in the western part of the zone. The structure of this zone resulted from three phases of deformation (Marcos, 1973). The first deformation phase (D1) gave rise to foreland-verging folds (F1) with associated axial planar cleavage (S1) and sub-horizontal hinges. The second phase (D2) gave rise to thrusts and shear zones with abundant minor structures (F2 and S2), and the third phase (D3) gave rise to upright open folds (F3) with associated crenulation cleavage (S3), being F3 folds almost homoaxial with F1 folds. Post D3 structures are represented by sub-horizontal kink bands and normal faults.

The kink bands are well developed in a slate belt formed by the Luarca Slates (Middle Ordovician) in the oriental part of the Westernasturian-Leonese Zone (Navia-Alto Sil Unit; Marcos, 1973), in the chlorite metamorphic zone. These kink bands were studied in this slate belt by several authors (Matte, 1968, 1969; Marcos, 1973; Pulgar, 1980; Julivert and Soldevila, 1998). According to them, they have subhorizontal kink planes, they deform the slaty cleavage (S1) that presented high dip angles, and they are the last structures to form; conjugate kink bands are rare. The mechanisms that formed these structures are not well known. Within this slate belt, we consider three areas for this study (Fig. 2): the area close to Boal (Boal area), the area between Berducedo and Grandas de Salime (Grandas area), and the sector of the Cantabrian coast near Luarca (Luarca area). The dip direction of the slaty cleavage is to the west or northwest in general and the angle ranges between 30° and 90°, with a modal interval of between 60° and 70°. The dispersion of values is higher in the Boal area. The Luarca area contains a lower number of kink bands than the other two, so the volume of data it provides is not suitable for a comparative analysis with the other areas. However, the three areas are nearby and their stratigraphic, structural and metamorphic features are similar, being in the Luarca area where the evolution of the kink bands with respect to other structures has been best explained (Fig. 3). Therefore, the Luarca area, which is very well exposed, provides valuable information for the interpretation of the formation mechanisms of kink bands, in this slate belt of the Westernasturian-Leonese zone.

A thorough analysis of kink bands requires considering the physical conditions that enabled their development. The analysis of quartz veins that occur in the Luarca area can provide insights into the understanding of these conditions. These veins formed at early stages of the development of the third regional deformation phase and were subsequntly folded during this phase (Pérez-Alonso et al., 2016). At the same time, an associated axial planar crenulation cleavage developed on the S1. Therefore, these veins formed in the deformational event prior to the development of the kink bands. In order to know the conditions of formation of these veins, Pérez-Alonso et al. (2016) combined the chlorite geothermometers of Cathelineau (1988), and Kranidiotis and MacLean (1987), the thermobarometry of Titanium-in-quartz, and the study of fluid inclusions in quartz. These authors distinguished between two types of inclusions: primary aqueous-carbonic fluid inclusions (type I), and secondary aqueous fluid inclusions (type II). The latter form fluid inclusion planes in transgranular microcracks that crosscut the quartz grains; these microcracks were the result of a fracturing event following the plastic deformation of quartz due to the third deformation phase. Pérez-Alonso et al. (2016) conclude that the temperature of the veins forming fluid was between 350 and 375 °C and the fluid pressure fluctuated between 220 MPa (lithostatic pressure) and 75 MPa (infralithostic pressure). The type II inclusions were entrapped at temperatures between 140 and 251 °C, and at a hydrostatic pressure < 2 MPa. Like the kink bands, the microcracks that affect the veins were generated after the third phase of deformation and, although kink bands and microcracks cannot be directly correlated, the latter indicate a decrease in temperature after the third deformation phase. This conclusion can also be applied to the areas of Boal and Grandas.

thumbnail Fig. 3

Evolutionary outline of the structure in the Luarca area. (a) Attitude of the cleavage S1 after the first deformation phase; (b) development of major folds during the third deformation phase with subhorizontal limbs and steeper limbs; (c) tightening of the third phase folds with development of minor folds and S3 cleavage in the subhorizontal limbs; (d) development of kink bands on strongly inclined limbs. After Bastida et al. (2010).

2.2 Description of the structures

The studied kink bands are sinistral when viewed towards the north, with angles φ and φK presenting a great dispersion (Fig. 4a). Except in a few cases (2.16%), the two angles are not equal, with a slight majority of cases in which φK > φ (50.35%), the cases in which φK < φ (47.48%) being numerous in all three areas. A number of the points representative of kink bands of the Boal area coexist with those of the Grandas and Luarca areas in one sector of the diagram in Figure 4a. However, the points corresponding to the Boal area show dispersion towards lower φ and φK values; this tendency is not observed in the Grandas area. In general, the value of φ increases as the S1 dip increases, with the occurrence of lower values of φ and S1 dip more common in the Boal area than in the Grandas area (Fig. 4b).

The interlimb angle (φ + φK) of the kink bands presents different frequency distribution patterns in the two areas considered for comparison (Fig. 5). In the Grandas area, most of the interlimb angles range between 120° and 160°, with a mean value of 142.4, whereas the Boal area presents a greater dispersion of values without a well-defined modal interval. In addition, the latter area presents a much larger number of cases with angles ranging from 60° to 120°, these lower values corresponding to chevron or quasi-chevron folds. When the interlimb angle is related to other geometrical parameters of the kink bands, we observe that:

  • in the Grandas area, the interlimb angle shows little variation between 120° and 160° and is independent of the φ value, whereas in the Boal area the larger the interlimb angle the larger the φ value (Fig. 6);

  • the correlation of a larger interlimb angle for a larger φK occurs in both the Granda and Boal areas (Fig. 7), although the correlation is more noticeable in the latter, with larger interlimb angle variation from 80° to 160°. The value of φK exerts a stronger influence on the interlimb angle than does the value of φ in Grandas area.

In most cases, dilation within the kink band [100×(final area-initial area)/initial area] lies between a 20% increase and a 20% decrease (90% of the kink bands of the Grandas area and 76.5% of those of the Boal area are within that range).

The bands very commonly present fractures along one or both boundaries. In many cases, the fractures are sharp and well developed, whereas in others they have a subtler, discontinuous nature. The fractures can be planar or irregular, and sometimes they appear inside the band, generating thin bands juxtaposed to the major band. It is also possible to observe fractures outside the kink bands but parallel to them. Sometimes, small steps between folia inside the band are observed; they crosscut the fractures that limit the band and therefore, they developed after them.

It is common for the S1 foliation to present a different appearance inside the band than outside it. S1 is usually more marked and sometimes more open inside the band, but this is not always the case; exceptionally, the opposite may occur. In general, when the foliation appears open within the band, φK > φ. Secondary spaced foliation inside the bands and oblique to the kink planes has been observed in some localities near Berducedo; this foliation has also been observed by other authors (Matte, 1969; Marcos, 1973).

The folds sometimes present a geometry similar to that of chevron folds (Fig. 8). These folds occur through the development of adjacent kink bands in such a way that one limb is only a little longer than the other.

thumbnail Fig. 4

φK against φ(a) and S1 dip against φ (b) for the Grandas, Boal and Luarca areas.

thumbnail Fig. 5

Frequency histograms of the interlimb angle (φ + φK) for the Grandas area (a) and the Boal area (b).

thumbnail Fig. 6

Interlimb angle (φ + φK) against φ for the Grandas area (a) and the Boal area (b).

thumbnail Fig. 7

Interlimb angle (φ + φK) against φK for the Grandas area (a) and the Boal area (b).

thumbnail Fig. 8

Small chevron folds formed by juxtaposition of kink bands (Boal area).

2.3 Interpretation and discussion

The kink bands in the slate belt have been interpreted as late Variscan structures caused by compressive stresses driven by gravitational body forces. This interpretation is based on the subhorizontal disposition of most of the kink bands, developed on pelitic rocks with steeply dipping S1 (Matte, 1969; Pulgar, 1980; Julivert and Soldevila, 1998; Bastida et al., 2010). The existence of a certain obliquity between the maximum compressive stress direction and S1 has been put forward as the reason for only a single set of kink bands appearing, conjugate kink bands being very rare.

The understanding of how the progressive deformation operated during the development of kink bands is required in order decipher the mechanisms involved in their formation. This is possible in some experimentally generated kink bands, but it is a difficult task in natural kink bands. In fact, sinusoidal waves corresponding to the early stages of folding, as predicted by some theoretical studies (Cobbold et al., 1971; Honea and Johnson, 1976; Price and Cosgrove, 1990), or small cores of kink bands, as observed in some experiments (Paterson and Weiss, 1966; Weiss, 1969), have not been found in the studied areas. However, there are some indications that can help explain the kinematic development of these structures.

Although it is generally accepted that the mechanism of hinge migration implies that φK = φ, and that the foliation rotation stops when this equality is met (Anderson, 1969), a large dispersion of values of these angles occurs in the kink bands analyzed, with φK < φ being very common (Fig. 4a). Comparable angular relations have been obtained by Anderson (1969) and Fyson (1969) in natural kink bands of Nova Scotia and Northern Ireland respectively, and by Donath (1969) in experimental kink bands. The inequality between φ and φK provides a first argument in favor of rotation and slip along the foliation in the development of the kink bands. The thermobarometric data from quartz veins suggest that the kink bands formed under conditions of low confining pressure. The experimental tests carried out in rocks by Anderson (1974) show that under these conditions (confining pressure < 250 MPa) the development of shear fractures predominates. However, these experiments were carried out at room temperature, while in the kink bands under study the temperature was probably > 100 °C, which increased the ductility of the rock, facilitating the coexistence of kink bands and fractures. This interpretation agrees with the common occurrence of fractures along the kink planes, even in gentle kink bands; this fact does not preclude a thickening of the band to the present fractured state, but does preclude any subsequent evolution by hinge migration. In addition, the mechanism of hinge migration involves an increase of the deformed area but not an increase in the intensity of the deformation inside the band, which hinders the development of fractures. In contrast, the mechanism of rotation of the folia implies an increase of the deformation inside the band, which may lead to the development of fractures. This interpretation is in agreement with the Anderson’s (1974) conclusion that states that the experimental kink bands in slates form by slip and rotation of the folia under low pressure conditions.

The graphs that relate S1 dip, φ, φK and the interlimb angle (φ + φK) in the areas of Grandas and Boal provide insights into kinematics. The general decrease of the angle φ when S1 dip decreases (Fig. 4b) can be interpreted in two ways:

  • it may be due to a variation of the obliquity angle between the foliation and the direction of maximum compression. According to the theoretical results obtained by Cobbold et al. (1971) and Price and Cosgrove (1990), an increase of the obliquity between the anisotropy and the direction of the maximum compression causes an increase of the angle φ, so that when the obliquity angle is 45°, the angle φ reaches 90° and the kink band is placed at the boundary between the compressional and extensional types;

  • it may be due to a rotation of the foliation outside the kink bands in order to decrease φ. This rotation would have been greater in the Boal area than in the Grandas area.

Figure 6 shows that in the Grandas area it is difficult to discriminate between the two previous options (Fig. 6a). However, in the Boal area (Fig. 6b) the second option seems the most appropriate, since the decrease in φ is associated with a decrease in the interlimb angle, that is, a tightening of the fold and consequently a rotation of the limb. In any case, the occurrence of obliquity between the anisotropy and the direction of the maximum compression could explain the development of high φ angles in some kink bands of the studied areas.

The observation of Figures 6 and 7 allows interpreting that, in the Grandas area, the tightening of the kink bands is related to the decrease of the angle φK more than to the decrease of φ, while in the Boal area, this tightening is associated with the decrease of both angles (φ and φK). The resulting lower interlimb angles in the Boal area than in the Grandas area (Fig. 5) relate with the greater bulk shortening associated with the kink bands in Boal. Therefore, in this case, both limbs undergo appreciable rotation and deformation.

Small chevron folds in the Boal area, and to a lesser extent in the Grandas area, occur in outcrops with more intense bulk shortening, which has led to the occurrence of very numerous close kink bands. This closeness leads to a loss of asymmetry of the kink bands that become chevron folds. This indicates that these chevrons are not generated by intersection of conjugated kink bands, which do not exist in this area. The development of chevron folds involves the formation of numerous parallel kink bands very close to each other and the rotation of both limbs, with the consequent decrease in the angle between them. Thus, the chevron geometry of these folds is characterized by a lower interlimb angle and a lower asymmetry than in the case of kink bands, with a complete transition existing between these two types of folds. Therefore, the development of chevron folds is associated with an increase in the amount of shortening, and not with a change in lithology.

From the above it is clear that, with the exception of the first stages of development of the kink bands, for which there is no evidence of the operating mechanisms, the dominant mechanism for development of kink bands was slip between the folia and their rotation. This is particularly clear in the Boal area, where both limbs most frequently rotated to eventually result in small chevron folds. This mechanism also agrees with the common occurrence of different values of φK in kink bands of the same outcrop, in which the values of φ are almost constant, and also with the fact that φ and φK are generally different.

The conclusion that the mechanism involved in the formation of the kink bands in the studied areas is the rotation and slip of the foliation contrasts with the results obtained in some experiments, which suggest a hinge migration mechanism (Paterson and Weiss, 1966; Weiss, 1969; Stewart and Alvarez, 1991). This discrepancy is due to the limitations of the experiments in simulating natural kink bands, because they are carried out under different conditions than those occurring in the natural ones. The experiments using rocks are carried out in triaxial presses in which the samples are surrounded by a metal or rubber jacket, while the experiments with cards are carried out employing presses with two pistons exerting compressive stresses in perpendicular directions, with the plane that contains these two directions unconfined (Weiss, 1969). In addition to the difference in size of the samples in the two types of experiments (greater in the case of cards), and in the way of applying the compressive stresses, the progressive development of the kink bands can be observed in the card experiments, whereas only the final stage can be observed in the rocks experiments. This may lead us to think that the experiments with cards are more advantageous; however, the rheological behavior of the cards is very different from that of the rocks. The cards do not break during the experiments, whereas the rocks can break; in fact, in the natural example studied, kink planes are very often fractures. Another important drawback of all of the experiments is that the effects of temperature, pore-fluid pressure, and strain rate were not considered. The absence of fractures and the difficulty of undergoing volume changes in card experiments facilitates hinge migration in the kink bands formed in these materials, which seems more difficult in natural kink bands.

The incipient oblique crenulation cleavage that appears in alternating limbs involves pressure solution. It is probably a late structure in the evolution of the kink bands that developed in the limbs with more favorable orientation in relation to the compressive stress. This cleavage mainly appears when the shortening is important and very close kink bands develop.

According to the rotation model, the inequality φK < φ implies a decrease in area in the kink band, which in many cases exceeds 20%. The decrease in area would have been lower if the foliation, in addition to undergoing rotation, had suffered longitudinal stretching within the band when φK < φ. Thus, in the limit case in which the deformation happened to be by simple shear, there would be no change in area. Unfortunately, no structural evidence of this stretching has been found.

The dominant mechanism in the development of the studied kink bands, slip between folia and their rotation, can be described by the type of deformation called “rotation shear” (Bastida et al., 2018; Bobillo-Ares et al., 2018). We can assume that these structures are generated in a rock band whose boundaries have an invariant direction defined by vector ĥ (Fig. 9); segments with this direction do not undergo any change in length. Inside the band, the folia rotate through an angle ψ without undergoing any change in length. Then, in the vector basis (ê1, ê2), the corresponding matrix of the deformation gradient is (Bobillo-Ares et al., 2018): (1)

The change in area is given by the determinant of the previous matrix: (2)

This function is equivalent to equation (7-53) by Ramsay (1967) and is graphically represented in Figure 10 for several φ values. Since changes in length do not occur at the boundary of a kink band, the curves in Figure 10 also show the change in thickness of the kink band during its development. With an exception when φ = 90°, we can observe that the initial area and thickness increase, followed by a decrease; the point at which J = 1 that separates the two parts of each curve corresponds to the stage with φ = φK.

The principal values of the strain are: (3) and the direction of the major axis of the strain ellipse is that of the bisector of angle φK. The corresponding ratio between the lengths of the axes of the strain ellipse is: (4)

This function is shown graphically in Figure 11a for several φ values. We can observe that for ψ values lower than 50°, the value of φ barely influences the value of R. Assuming a mechanism of slip between folia and their rotation, the results of the determination of R in kink bands of the Grandas and Boal areas are shown in Figure 11b. Values of ψ > 60° and R > 3 are very rare in the Grandas area but common in the Boal area. We can confirm that these high values of ψ and R occur in localities of the Boal area where the kink bands are very close together and form chevron folds, indicating that the foliation has rotated in the two limbs of the structure. Because the model involves no rotation outside the kink band, it is not possible to establish from this figure, a discrimination of the cases with rotation of foliation outside the band from those that have not undergone rotation.

Longitudinal stretching of the foliation may occur inside the band, which avoids the problem caused by an excessive decrease in area inside the kink band. In this case, the deformation gradient given by equation (1) changes to: (5) where Λ is the stretch () in the foliation direction. The associated change in area is the determinant of this matrix: (6)

This function has been represented in Figure 12 for φ = 60° and several values of the stretch Λ. Each curve contains a part that represents an area increase and that has been drawn with a dashed line. This increase involves an elongation in all directions that seems unlikely in kink bands. For values of ψ higher than a certain value, a decrease in area occurs, which is lower for higher stretch values. Thus, for example, a value of ψ = 80°, folia rotation (Λ = 1) would generate an area decrease of 26%, while a folia stretch of 1.2 would generate a decrease of 11%.

thumbnail Fig. 9

Scheme showing the geometry of rotation shear in the development of a kink band. The direction defined by ĥ (or φ) is invariant and of no longitudinal strain. Segments in the ê1-direction undergo a rotation ψ inside the kink band but do not undergo changes in length. Lines marked K-P are the kink planes (or boundaries of the kink band). Point Q of the undeformed configuration is transformed into point q of the deformed configuration.

thumbnail Fig. 10

Area change as a function of the angle ψ for several values of angle φ in a kink band formed by rotation shear (Clifford, 1969).

thumbnail Fig. 11

(a) Ratio R between the strain ellipse axes as a function of the ψ angle for several values of angle φ in a kink band formed by rotation shear; (b) values of R obtained from measurements of φ and ψ made in kink bands of the Grandas and Boal areas.

thumbnail Fig. 12

Area change (J and Δ) in kink bands, with φ = 60°, generated by foliation rotation (angle ψ) plus foliation stretching (numbers on the curves). Dashed lines indicate area increase and continuous lines indicate area decrease.

3 Conclusions

Late Variscan kink bands have been studied in three areas of the Westasturian-Leonese Zone (Grandas, Boal and Luarca areas). They developed in slates due to vertical compressive stresses of gravitational origin in areas where slaty cleavage was in a steep position. Kink bands formed with subhorizontal or gently dipping kink planes, and the obliquity between the direction of maximum compressive stress and cleavage planes prevented the development of conjugated link bands and favored the appearance of high φ angles.

In general, φK ≠ φ and the presence of fractures along the kink planes is very common. Then, excluding the first stages of the development of kink bands of the Grandas, Luarca and Boal areas, in which the formation mechanism could not be established, we suggest that slip between folia and their rotation is the dominant mechanism in the development of these folds. Discrepancies with some experimental results are due to differences in conditions of development of natural kink bands and those in experiments. For example, cards do not break during the experiments while rocks do.

In the Grandas area, the decrease of the interlimb angle associated with the evolution of the kink bands is mainly produced by rotation of the folia inside the band (decrease in φK), while in the Boal area, it occurs by rotation of the folia inside and outside the band (decrease of φK and φ). In highly shortened areas, many parallel kink bands develop next to each other, giving rise to chevron folds, which have interlimb angles lower than those of the isolated kink bands.

A geometrical analysis of kink bands developed by slip between folia and their rotation shows that the ratio between the lengths of the axes of the strain ellipse increases with increase in the deflection angle ψ of folded folia, and is almost independent of the orientation of the kink band boundaries (given by angle φ) when angle ψ is lower than 50°, a condition that is accomplished by most kink bands.

The development of the kink bands by rotation shear involves a change in area and thickness of the band. In general, these magnitudes increase up to a maximum and then decrease, and are capable of eventually reaching values lower than the initial ones. We propose that a low stretching of the foliation within the kink band could result in a decrease in area much lower than that caused by simple rotation of the foliation. This proposal remains as a hypothesis for further research.

Acknowledgements

The present paper has been supported by the CGL2015-66997-R project funded by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of Spain. We are grateful to Josep Poblet and an anonymous reviewer for the many valuable suggestions that have notably improved the paper. We thank Luis Antonio Barrio Álvarez, John Hardwick and Robin Walker for their help with the language of the manuscript.

References

  • Anderson TB. 1964. Kink-bands and related geological structures. Nature 202: 272–274. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson TB. 1969. The geometry of a natural orthorhombic system of kink-bands. In: Baer AJ, Norris DK, eds. Kink bands and brittle deformation. Geological Survey Canadian Paper 68-52: 200–220. [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson TB. 1974. The relationship between kink bands and shear fractures in the experimental deformation of slate. Journal of the Geolologica Society of London 130: 367–382. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bastida F, Aller J, Pulgar JA, Toimil NC, Fernández FJ, Bobillo-Ares NC, Menéndez, CO. 2010. Folding in orogens: a case study in the northern Iberian Variscan belt. Geological Journal 45: 597–622. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bastida F, Bobillo-Ares NC, Aller J, Lisle RJ. 2018. A homogeneous 2D deformation of geological interest: rotation shear. Journal of Structural Geology 112: 131–137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bhattacharya DS. 1977. Geometry of kink bands − a theoretical analysis. American Journal of Science 277: 503–508. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bobillo-Ares NC, Bastida F, Aller J, Lisle RJ. 2018. Some kinematical patterns leading to the formation of similar folds. Journal of Structural Geology 112: 69–80. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cathelineau M. 1988. Cation site occupancy in chlorites and illites as a function of temperature. Clay Minerals 23: 471–485. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clifford PM. 1969. Kink band development in the Lake St. Joseph Area, Northwestern Ontario. The geometry of a natural orthorhombic system of kink-bands. In: Baer AJ, Norris DK, eds. Kink bands and brittle deformation. Geological Survey Canadian Paper 68–52: 229–242. [Google Scholar]
  • Cobbold PR, Cosgrove, JW, Summers, JM. 1971. Development of internal structures in deformed anisotropic rocks. Tectonophysics 12: 23–53. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dewey JF. 1965. Nature and origin of kink bands. Tectonophysics 1: 459–494. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dewey JF. 1969. The origin and development of kink-bands in a foliated body. Geological Journal 6: 193–216. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Donath FA. 1964. Kink-banding as a mechanism of faulting in anisotropic rocks. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 45: 103–104. [Google Scholar]
  • Donath FA. 1968. The development of kink bands in brittle anisotropic rock. Geological Society of America Memoires 115: 453–493. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Donath FA. 1969. Experimental study of kink-band development in strongly anisotropic rock. In: Baer AJ, Norris DK, eds. Kink bands and brittle deformation. Geological Survey Canadian Paper 68-52: 255–258. [Google Scholar]
  • Dunham RE, Crider JG, Burmester RF, Schermer ER, Housen BA. 2011. Geometry, microstructures, and magnetic fabrics of kink bands in the Darrington Phyllite, northwestern Washington, USA: processes within fixed-hinge kinking. Journal of Structural Geology 33: 1627–1638. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fyson WK. 1969. Profile variation in a kink set. In: Baer AJ, Norris DK, eds. Kink bands and brittle deformation. Geological Survey Canadian Paper 68–52: 243–254. [Google Scholar]
  • Gay NC, Weiss LE. 1974. The relationship between principal stress directions and the geometry of kinks in foliated rocks. Tectonophysics 21: 287–300. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Honea E, Johnson AM. 1976. A theory of concentric, kink and sinusoidal folding and of monoclinal flexuring of compressible, elastic multilayers: IV. Development of sinusoidal and kink folds in multilayers confined by rigid boundaries. Tectonophysics 30: 197–239. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hunt GW, Peletier MA, Wadee MA. 2000. The Maxwell stability criterion in pseudo-energy models of kink banding. Journal of Structural Geology 22: 669–681. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson MR. 1956. Conjugate lold systems in the Moine Thrust Zone in the Lochcarron and Coulin Forest areas of Wester Ross. Geological Magazine 93: 345–350. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Julivert M, Soldevila J. 1998. Small-scale structures formed during progressive shortening and subsequent collapse in the Navia-Alto Sil slate belt (Hercinian fold belt, NW Spain). Journal of Structural Geology 20: 447–458. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kranidiotis P, MacLean WH. 1987. Systematics of chlorite alteration at the Phelps Dodge massive sulfide deposit, Matagami, Quebec. Economic Geology 82: 1898–1911. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marcos A. 1973. Las series del Paleozoico inferior y la estructura herciniana del occidente de Asturias (NW de España). Trabajos de Geología 6: 3–113. [Google Scholar]
  • Matte P. 1968. La structure de la virgation hercynienne de Galice (Espagne). Extrait des travaux du laboratoire de géologie de la Faculté des Sciences de Grenoble 44: 1–128. [Google Scholar]
  • Matte P. 1969. The kink-bands-Example de déformation tardive dans l’Hercynien du Nord-Ouest de l’Espagne. Tectonophysics 7: 309–322. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Misra S, Burg JP. 2012. Mechanics of kink-bands during torsion deformation of muscovite aggregate. Tectonophysics 548-549: 22–33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Paterson MS, Weiss LE. 1962. Experimental folding in rocks. Nature 195: 1046–1048. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Paterson MS, Weiss LE. 1966. Experimental deformation and folding in phyllite. Geological Society of American Bulletin 77: 343–374. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pérez-Alonso J, Fuertes-Fuente M, Bastida F. 2016. Quartz veining in slates and Variscan deformation: Insights from the Luarca sector (NW Spain). Tectonophysics 671: 24–41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Price NJ, Cosgrove JW. 1990. Analysis of geological structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University press. [Google Scholar]
  • Pulgar JA. 1980. Análisis e interpretación de las estructuras originadas durante las fases de replegamiento en la Zona Asturoccidental-leonesa (Cordillera Herciniana, NW de España). Unpublished PhD Thesis, Universidad de Oviedo, 334 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Ramberg IB, Johnson AM. 1976. A theory of concentric, kink and sinusoidal folding and of monoclinal flexuring of compressible, elastic multilayers: V. Asymmetric folding in interbedded chert and shale of the Franciscan Complex, San Francisco Bay area, California. Tectonophysics 32: 295–320. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ramsay JG. 1962. The geometry of conjugate fold systems. Geological Magazine 99: 516–526. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ramsay JG. 1967. Folding and fracturing of rocks. New York: Mc-Graw Hill. [Google Scholar]
  • Reches Z, Johnson AM. 1976. A theory of concentric, kink and sinusoidal folding and of monoclinal flexuring of compressible, elastic multilayers: VI. Asymmetric folding and monoclinal kinking. Tectonophysics 35: 295–334. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rondeel HE. 1969a. On the nucleation of kink bands. In: Baer AJ, Norris DK, eds. Kink bands and brittle deformation. Geological Survey Canadian Paper 68-52: 363–365. [Google Scholar]
  • Rondeel HE. 1969b. On the formation of kink bands. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Series B-Palaeontology Geology Physics Chemistry Anthropology 72: 317–329. [Google Scholar]
  • Sharma BK, Bhola AM. 2005. Kink bands in the Chamba region, Western Himalaya, India. Journal of Asian Earth Science 25: 513–528. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stewart KG, Alvarez W. 1991. Mobile-hinge kinking in layered rocks and models. Journal of Structural Geology 13: 243–259. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wadee MA, Hunt GW, Peletier MA. 2004. Kink band instability in layered structures. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 52: 1071–1091. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weiss LE. 1969. Flexural slip folding of foliated model materials. In: Baer AJ, Norris DK, eds. Kink bands and brittle deformation. Geological Survey Canadian Paper 68-52: 294–357. [Google Scholar]
  • Weiss LE. 1980. Nucleation and growth of kink bands. Tectonophysics 65: 1–38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Aller J, Bastida F, Bobillo-Ares NC. 2020. On the development of kink-bands: A case study in the Westasturian-Leonese Zone (Variscan belt, NW Spain), BSGF - Earth Sciences Bulletin 191: 6.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Sinistral kink band with indication of some parameters used in the analysis of structures of this type; KP, kink planes (near Grandas de Salime, Asturias, Spain).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

Geological map of the Veriscan belt in NW Spain with the location of the three studied areas in the Navia-Alto Sil slate belt.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

Evolutionary outline of the structure in the Luarca area. (a) Attitude of the cleavage S1 after the first deformation phase; (b) development of major folds during the third deformation phase with subhorizontal limbs and steeper limbs; (c) tightening of the third phase folds with development of minor folds and S3 cleavage in the subhorizontal limbs; (d) development of kink bands on strongly inclined limbs. After Bastida et al. (2010).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

φK against φ(a) and S1 dip against φ (b) for the Grandas, Boal and Luarca areas.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5

Frequency histograms of the interlimb angle (φ + φK) for the Grandas area (a) and the Boal area (b).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 6

Interlimb angle (φ + φK) against φ for the Grandas area (a) and the Boal area (b).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 7

Interlimb angle (φ + φK) against φK for the Grandas area (a) and the Boal area (b).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 8

Small chevron folds formed by juxtaposition of kink bands (Boal area).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 9

Scheme showing the geometry of rotation shear in the development of a kink band. The direction defined by ĥ (or φ) is invariant and of no longitudinal strain. Segments in the ê1-direction undergo a rotation ψ inside the kink band but do not undergo changes in length. Lines marked K-P are the kink planes (or boundaries of the kink band). Point Q of the undeformed configuration is transformed into point q of the deformed configuration.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 10

Area change as a function of the angle ψ for several values of angle φ in a kink band formed by rotation shear (Clifford, 1969).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 11

(a) Ratio R between the strain ellipse axes as a function of the ψ angle for several values of angle φ in a kink band formed by rotation shear; (b) values of R obtained from measurements of φ and ψ made in kink bands of the Grandas and Boal areas.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 12

Area change (J and Δ) in kink bands, with φ = 60°, generated by foliation rotation (angle ψ) plus foliation stretching (numbers on the curves). Dashed lines indicate area increase and continuous lines indicate area decrease.

In the text

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.