Open Access

Table 1

Comparison of bibliographic data supporting published Urgonian facies models. If not specifically mentioned, cited figures refer to the reference paper. See text and Section 5.5 for related comments and localities, respectively.

Arnaud-Vanneau and Arnaud, 1976 Arnaud-Vanneau, 1979 Arnaud-Vanneau et al., 1982 Arnaud-Vanneau et al., 1987 Bodin, 2006 Godet et al., 2010 Masse and Fenerci-Masse, 2011
Shoal or “haut-fond” model Platform model Photozoan Heterozoan
Bibliographic origin University Grenoble Grenoble Grenoble, Lyon and Marseille Grenoble Lausanne-Neuchâtel Lausanne-Neuchâtel Aix-Marseille
Reference Arnaud-Vanneau and Arnaud, 1976; Arnaud-Vanneau, 1980: Arnaud, 1981 Arnaud-Vanneau and Arnaud, 1976; Arnaud-Vanneau, 1979; Arnaud-Vanneau, 1980: Arnaud, 1981 Arnaud-Vanneau and Arnaud, 1976; Arnaud-Vanneau, 1980; Masse and Philip, 1981 Arnaud-Vanneau and Arnaud, 1976; Arnaud-Vanneau, 1979; Arnaud-Vanneau, 1980: Arnaud, 1981 Arnaud-Vanneau, 1980; Föllmi et al., 1994, 2006; Bodin, 2006; Bodin et al., 2006 Arnaud-Vanneau, 1980; Arnaud-Vanneau et al., 1987; Arnaud-Vanneau and Arnaud, 2005; Godet, 2006; Godet et al., 2010 Masse, 1976, 1993; Arnaud-Vanneau, 1980; Masse and Philip, 1981
Spatial data Region Subalpine region Subalpine region SE France Jura-Subalpine region Helvetic Mountains (Switzerland and Austria) Helvetic and Jura Mountains (Switzerland) SE France
Zone Vercors Vercors Subalpine domain, Bas-Vivarais and Provence From Neuchâtel to Die Helvetic thrust and fold belt Western Swiss Jura Provence
Palaeogeographic location In the vicinity of the northern margin of the Vocontian Basin In the vicinity of the northern margin of the Vocontian Basin French Peri-Vocontian platforms Northern Peri-Vocontian platform Switzerland northern Peri-Vocontian platform Switzerland northern Peri-Vocontian platform Southern Peri-Vocontian platform
Data collection area 50 km2 (Figs. 4–12) cf. model of Arnaud-Vanneau and Arnaud, 1976 400 000 km2 (Figs. 5 and 6) 300 km-long transect (Fig. A28) 8000 km2 incl. a 70-km-long correlated transect (Föllmi et al., 1994, Fig. 1) 60-km-long transect (Fig. 1) 22 500 km2 incl. a 130-km-long correlated transect (6 reference log sections; Figs. 3 and 21)
Number of data 24 log sections (Figs. 4–12) cf. model of Arnaud-Vanneau and Arnaud, 1976 13 reference log sections, several hundreds and up to 1000-m-thick (Fig. 9) 7 reference log sections, several hundreds and up to 2000-m-thick (Fig. A30) 19 log sections, from m-scale to > 100-m-thick Lower Cretaceous sections (cf. Föllmi et al., 1994, Figs. 1 and 2) Five log sections, from 10 to < 100-m-thick (Fig. 17) 65 log sections, from few meters to 250-m-thick (Figs. 3 and 21)
Spatial resolution (log distance) 5–15 km (Figs. 4–12) cf. model of Arnaud-Vanneau and Arnaud, 1976 25–70 km (Fig. 9A) 5–15 km (Fig. A29) and up to 50 km (Figs. A28 and A31) 5–20 km (Föllmi et al., 1994, Figs. 1 and 2) 10–30 km (Fig. 1) 3–55 km (Figs. 3, 10 and 12)
Thickness Maximum thickness of “contemporaneaous strata” 220-m-thick log of Bi6 sequence (Arnaud, 1981, p. 52) < 300-m-thick log from Bs2 to Ai2 (Arnaud, 1981, p. 52) Undefined; facies model representative for ca. 1000-m-thick deposits from Bi2 to Ai2 (Arnaud, 1981, p. 52) Undefined; facies model representative for up to 1000-m-thick deposits (Fig. 9) Undefined; facies model representative for up to 2000-m-thick deposits (Fig. A30) Undefined for the Upper Barremian-Lower Aptian interval (Schrattenkalk and Drusberg Fm; Figs. A.2.5, B.2.2 and C.5.7) [ca. 60 m in Godet et al., 2010, Fig. 19] Undefined for the Upper Barremian-Lower Aptian interval (Lower Orbitolina Beds and Drusberg Fm; Figs. A.2.5, B.2.2 and C.5.7) [ca. 10 m in Godet et al., 2010, Fig. 19] 30-m-thick “Urgonien Jaune Fm” TST (Fig. 17) Rudist facies association mainly show 50- and up to 100-m-thick deposits (Figs. 10–14, 17 and 21)
Temporal data Age Lower Barremian at the Lower Barremian-Upper Barremian boundary (Bi6 sequence; Figs. 2 and 6) Upper Barremian boundary (BsAi sequence; Figs. 2 and 10) Barremian–Lower Aptian (from Bi2 to Ai2 sequences; cf. model of Arnaud-Vanneau and Arnaud, 1976) Valanginian–Aptian (Tab. 1) Berriasian–Aptian (Fig. A27) Upper Barremian–Lower Aptian (ca. 122–127 Ma; Fig. A.2.5) Upper Barremian-Lower Aptian (around 128 and 124 Ma; Fig. A.2.5) Hauterivian–Barremian (Fig. 2) Late Barremian–Lower Aptian (Figs. 2 and 20); also cf. later modification by Frau et al., 2018
Chronostratigraphic constraints Five ammonite-bearing localities, plus two localities from outside the study area, which ages are extrapolated to the Vercors; vertical orbitolinid succession calibrated to ammonites cf. model of Arnaud-Vanneau and Arnaud, 1976 Undefined Microfossil biostratigraphy (mainly orbitolinids) tied to earlier ammonite-age calibration cf. model of Arnaud-Vanneau and Arnaud, 1976) Four ammonite-bearing condensed horizons of Upper Hauterivian to late Lower Aptian in age in the type section (e.g. Tab. B.2.1; Figs. B.2.12, B.3.3 and B.4.4; also in Bodin et al., 2006; also cf. Föllmi et al., 2008) [none within the period of interest here, Upper Barremian–Lower Aptian] Various ammonites in the Hauterivian, micro- and macrofossils in the Barremian, a nannofossil-bearing condensed horizon in the early Late Barremian and phosphorus content correlation (Figs. 2, 15 and 16; also cf. Godet, 2006) 4 ammonite- and 4 bivalve-bearing beds are reported in figures (Figs. 8 and 11–14)
Temporal resolution ca. 3 Ma cf. model of Arnaud-Vanneau and Arnaud, 1976 Undefined cf. model of Arnaud-Vanneau and Arnaud, 1976 1 to 3 Ma (Figs. B.2.12, B.4.4 and C.5.7) ca. 1 and 2 Ma for the Hauterivian and Barremian, respectively (Figs. 2 and 19) ca. 1 Ma (Figs. 2, 8 and 11–14)
Lithostratigraphy and sequence stratigraphy temporal resolution ca. 0.5 Ma dividing equally the 5-Ma-long-Barremian stage into the 10 sequences (Fig. 2) ca. 0.5 Ma dividing equally the 5-Ma-long-Barremian stage into the 10 sequences (Fig. 2) cf. model of Arnaud-Vanneau and Arnaud, 1976 ca. 3 Ma based on stage calibration and discontinuities of supra-regional significance (cf. Tab. 1 and Fig. 9) cf. model of Arnaud-Vanneau and Arnaud, 1976 Down to 0.5 Ma (Fig. C.5.7) Down to 0.5 Ma for the Hauterivian (Fig. 19) ca. 1 Ma based on four drowning surfaces sensu Schlager (1981) and vertical rudist succession (U1–3) directly or indirectly tied to ammonite-age calibration (Figs. 2, 11 and 13)
Facies model Morphology Isolated flat-topped platform Attached flat-topped platform Isolated flat-topped platform Attached flat-topped platform Isolated flat-topped platform Distally-steepened ramp Homoclinal ramp Rimmed shelf Flat-topped platform (cf. Sect. 4 of Masse and Fenerci-Masse, 2011)
Spatial extent along dip 30 (Fig. 6) or 40 km (Fig. 3) 50 km (Fig. 3) 50 km (Fig. 3) No scale 100 km (Fig. A31) ca. 200 km (Figs. B.2.1 and B.4.4) ca. 200 km (Fig. 19; cf. Bodin, 2006) Up to 150 km (Fig. 2)
Facies model description and details Data herein; facies description, palaeogeographic maps and facies distribution Data in an earlier publication; facies description, paleontology, grain distribution and palaeoecology Data in an earlier publications; general sedimentary profile zonation, palaeogeographic maps and facies distribution evolution Data in earlier publications; microfacies description, general sedimentary profile and facies zonation, profile morphology and ammonite and foraminifera palaeoecology Data herein and in earlier publications; general ecological scheme and facies description Data herein and in earlier publications; facies description Data herein and in earlier publications; general sedimentary profile zonation, palaeogeographic maps and facies distribution
Base of facies model definition and supporting data Palaeogeographic, outcrop-data-based model (Figs. 4–12) Conceptual model integrating the non-contemporaneous, three data-based models of Arnaud-Vanneau and Arnaud, 1976 Palaeogeographic-map-based conceptual model (Figs. 3–8) Use of Arnaud-Vanneau (1979) model, palaeogeographic maps, Pérès and Picard (1964; Modern) and Masse (1976; Cretaceous) zonation schemes, and sequence stratigraphy Use of Arnaud-Vanneau (1980) general facies distribution and Föllmi et al. (1994) palaeoecological scheme; phosphorus patterns and sequence stratigraphy Use of Arnaud-Vanneau (1980) facies distribution and Föllmi et al. (1994) palaeoecological scheme; phosphorus content and sequence stratigraphy Palaeoenvironmental interpretations; zonation schemes of Pérès and Picard (1964; Modern) and Masse (Masse, 1976, 1991; Masse and Philip, 1981; Masse et al., 2003; Cretaceous)
Supporting concept Lateral sedimentological and palaeoecological succession Lateral sedimentological and palaeoecological succession (Figs. 2–4) Lateral sedimentological and palaeoecological succession Direct relationship between lateral and vertical facies succession (Figs. A11–A13 and A16) Föllmi et al. (1994) and James (1997) grain association classification; vertical facies change interpreted in terms of paleoenvironmental (e.g. Figs. C.3.2 and E.1.8) and sea-level changes (e.g. Figs. B.4.4 and C.5.7) Use of a standard rimmed shelf facies model (cf. Pomar, 2001; Arnaud-Vanneau and Arnaud, 2005; Godet et al., 2016, Sect. 3); direct relationship between lateral and vertical facies succession (e.g. Fig. 5) “Drowning unconformity” sensu Schlager (1998) and Cretaceous paleoecology (Masse, 1976, 1991)
Classification “Palaeoecological succession” “Palaeoecological succession” “Palaeoecological succession” “Standard microfacies lateral succession” Vertical “palaeoecological succession” “Standard topographic profile” Lateral “palaeoecological succession”
References applications Jura-Subalpine platform studies Jura-Subalpine domain studies Undetermined studies (general, non specific use) Sequence stratigraphic studies on the Vercors (e.g. Jacquin et al., 1991; Everts et al., 1995; Arnaud-Vanneau et al., 2005; Bastide, 2014; Bonvallet et al., 2019 Lausanne and Neuchâtel University studies (palaeoceanographic incl. carbon- and phosphorus-based studies) Bonvallet et al., 2019, but only the facies distribution, not the topographic profile Aix-Marseille University incl. Richet et al., 2011; Léonide et al., 2012; Tendil et al., 2018

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.