EDP Sciences logo
Soumettre un article
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 191 (2020) BSGF - Earth Sci. Bull., 191 (2020) 27 Références
Numéro
BSGF - Earth Sci. Bull.
Volume 191, 2020
Special Issue Paleontology
Numéro d'article 27
Nombre de pages 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/bsgf/2020029
Publié en ligne 23 septembre 2020
  • Apostolescu V. 1959. Ostracodes du Lias du Basin de Paris. Revue de l’Institut Français du Pétroles et Annales des Conbustibles Liquides 14: 795–826. [Google Scholar]
  • Ballent SC. 1987. Bioestratigrafia y edad de las microfaunas del Jurasico Inferior de Argentina. IV Congreso Latinamericano de Paleontologia, Bolivia 1: 331–342. [Google Scholar]
  • Ballent SC. 1991. Ostracodos del Jurasico Medio (Limite Aaleniano-Bayociano) en la Provincia del Neuquen, centro-oeste de Argentina. Revista Española de Micropaleontologia 23(3): 21–56. [Google Scholar]
  • Beher E. 2004. Ostracodenfauna und Biostratigraphie im Ober-Sinemurium von Süddeutschland und der Nordschweiz. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde B 349: 1–171. [Google Scholar]
  • Belousova ZD. 1965. Tip Arthropoda, Klass Crustacea, Podclass Ostracoda. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta, Akademia Nauk, SSSR 108: 254–265. [Google Scholar]
  • Benson RH. 1964. Recent cytheracean ostracodes from the McMurdo Sound and the Ross Sea, Antarctica. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions Article 6: 1–36. [Google Scholar]
  • Bradfield HH. 1935. Pennsylvanian Ostracoda of the Ardmore Basin, Oklahoma. Bulletins of American Paleontology 22(73): 1–173. [Google Scholar]
  • Brady GS. 1880. Report on the Ostracoda dredged by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–1876. Report on the scientific results of the voyage of H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–1876. Zoology 1(3): 1–184. [Google Scholar]
  • Cooper CL. 1946. Pennsylvanian Ostracodes of Illinois. Bulletin of the Illinois Geological Survey 70: 1–177. [Google Scholar]
  • Danielopol DL, Pinto RL, Gross M, Pereira J da S, Riedl N. 2014. On the evolutionary biology of Elpidium ostracods (Limnocytheridae, Timiriaseviinae): a proposal for pluridisciplinary studies. Geo-Eco-Marina 20: 87–129. [Google Scholar]
  • Danielopol DL, Namiotko T, Grafenstein U von, Fuhrmann R, Decrouy L, Gross M, et al. 2015. The implementation of taxonomic harmonisation for Candoninae (Ostracoda, Cypridoidea): a heueristic solution for Fabaeformiscandona tricicatricosa (Diebel and Pietrzeniuk). Geo-Eco-Marina 21: 111–158. [Google Scholar]
  • Donze P. 1966. Ostracodes de l’Hettangien entre Aubenas et Privas (Ardèche). Travaux des Laboratoires de Géologie de la Faculte des Sciences de Lyon NS, 13: 121–139. [Google Scholar]
  • Drexler E. 1958. Foraminiferen und Ostracoden aus dem Lias α von Siebeldingen/Pfalz. Geologisches Jahrbuch 75: 475–554. [Google Scholar]
  • Elmi S, Mouterde R. 1965. Cited by Donze (1966) without details. [Google Scholar]
  • Forel M-B, Grădinaru E. 2018. First report of ostracods (Crustacea) associated with Bithynian (Anisian, Middle Triassic) Tubiphytes-microbial reef in the North Dobrogean Orogen (Romania). Papers in Palaeontology 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/spp2.1103. [Google Scholar]
  • Gitter F, Gross M, Piller WE. 2015. Sub-decadal resolution in sediments of Late Miocene Lake Pannon reveals speciation of Cyprideis (Crustacea, Ostracoda). PloS ONE 10(4): e0109360. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109360. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Harloff J. 1993. Ostracoden des Unter-Pliensbachiums in Baden-Württemberg. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde B 191: 1–214. [Google Scholar]
  • Harloff J, Jäger R. 1994. Ostracoden aus dem Lias der Kalkalpen Bayerns und Nordtirols. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde B 205: 1–63. [Google Scholar]
  • Herrig E. 1979a. Ostrakoden aus dem Lias von Thüringen: Die Gattung Bairdia (Teil II), Fabalicypris und Bairdiacypris. Zeitschrift für Geologische Wissenschaften 7: 763–782. [Google Scholar]
  • Herrig E. 1979b. Weitere glattschalige Ostrakoden aus dem Lias von Thüringen. Zeitschrift für Geologische Wissenschaften 7: 1343–1361. [Google Scholar]
  • Holmes JA, Chivas AR, eds. 2002. The Ostracoda. Applications in Quaternary Research. Geophysical Monograph 131: viii + 1–313. American Geophysical Union. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Horne DJ. 2002. Ostracod biostratigraphy and palaeoecology of the Purbeck Limestone Group in Southern England. Special Papers in Palaeontology 68: 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  • Horne DJ, Cohen A, Martens K. 2002. In: Holmes JA, Chivas AR, eds. Taxonomy, morphology and biology of quaternary and living Ostracoda, pp. 5–36. [Google Scholar]
  • Horne DJ, Bunbury J, Whittaker JE. 2011a. Taxonomic harmonisation and calibration of nonmarine ostracods for palaeoclimate applications: the case of Candona acutula Delorme, 1967. Joannea Geologie und Paläontologie 11: 76–79. [Google Scholar]
  • Horne DJ, Jocque M, Brendonck L, Martens K. 2011b. On Potamocypris compressa (Crustacea, Ostracoda) from temporary rock pools in Utah, USA, with notes on the taxonomic harmonisation of North American and European ostracod faunas. Zootaxa 2793: 35–46. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Khosla SC, Jakhar SR, Kumari M. 2009. Atlas of the Middle Jurasssic Ostracods from Western India. Lucknow: Palaeontological Society of India, 167 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Klosa D. 1991. Kornformbestimmung mit Hilfe moderner Bildanalysemethoden. Geologisches Jahrbuch A 126: 235–255. [Google Scholar]
  • Kozur H. 1971. Die Bairdiacea der Trias. Teil III: Einige neue Arten triassischer Bairdiacea und Bemerkungen zur Herkunft der Macrocypridae (Cypridacea). Geologisch-Paläontologische Mitteilungen Innsbruck 1(6): 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  • Lethiers F. 1972. Ostracodes famenniens dan l’Ouest du Basin de Dinant (Ardenne). Annales de la Société Géologique du Nord XCII: 155–169. [Google Scholar]
  • Lord A. 1971. Revision of some Lower Lias Ostracoda from Yorkshire. Palaeontology 14: 642–665. [Google Scholar]
  • Luebimova PS. 1955. Ostrakody Mezozoyskikh otlozheniy srednego povozhya i obshchego syrta. (Ostracods of Mesozoic deposits in the Volga-Ural region). Trudy VNIGRI, New series, 84: 3–189. [Google Scholar]
  • Maddocks RF. 1966. Distribution patterns of living and subfossil podocopid ostracodes in the Nosy Bé area, northern Madagascar. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Paper 12, 1–72. [Google Scholar]
  • Martens K, Rossetti G, Baltanás A. 1998. Reproductive modes and taxonomy. In: Martens K, ed. Sex and parthenogenesis: evolutionary ecology of reproductive modes in non-marine ostracods, pp. 197–214. Leiden: Backhuys. [Google Scholar]
  • Mayden RL. 1997. A hierarchy of species concepts: the denouement in the saga of the species problem. In: Claridge MF, Dawah HA, Wilson MR, eds. Species, the units of diversity, pp. 381–424. Chapman & Hall. [Google Scholar]
  • Meisch C, Smith RJ, Martens K. 2019. A subjective global checklist of the extant non-marine Ostracoda (Crustacea). European Journal of Taxonomy 492: 1–135. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2019.492. [Google Scholar]
  • Mette W. 1995. Ostracods from the Middle Jurassic of southern Tunisia. Beringeria 16: 259–348. [Google Scholar]
  • Monostori M. 2008. Comparative study of the Pliensbachian and Toarcian ostracods in the Gerecse and Mecsek Mountains, Hungary. In: Galácz A, ed. 125th Anniversary of the Department of Palaeontology at Budapest. Hantkeniana 6: 17–31. [Google Scholar]
  • Müller GW. 1894. Die Ostracoden des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte. Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte. Herausgegeben von der Zoologischen Station zu Neapel 21: 1–404. [Google Scholar]
  • Oakley TH, Wolfe JM, Lindgren AR, Zaharoff AK. 2012. Phylotranscriptomics to bring the Understudied into the Fold: Monophyletic Ostracoda, Fossil Placement, and Pancrustacean Phylogeny. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 215–133. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss216. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pante E, et al. 2015. Species are hypotheses: avoid connectivity assessments based on pillars of sand. Molecular Ecology 24: 525–544. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Park LE, Smith AJ, eds. 2003. Bridging the Gap. Trends in the Ostracode and Biological Sciences. Paleontological Society Papers 9: xviii + 1–290. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rodriguez-Lazaro J, Ruiz-Muñoz F. 2012. A General Introduction to Ostracods: Morphology, Distribution, Fossil Record and Applications. In: Horne DJ, Holmes JA, Rodriguez-Lazaro J, Viehberg FA, eds. Ostracoda as Proxies for Quaternary Climate Change, pp. 1–14. Developments in Quaternary Science, 17. Amsterdam: Elsevier. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Roundy PV. 1926. Mississippian formations of San Saba County, Texas. Part 2: The Micro-fauna. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 146: 5–17. [Google Scholar]
  • Sars GO. 1866. Oversigt af Norges marine ostracoder. Forhandlinger i Videnskabs-selskebet i Christiania 1865: 1–130. [Google Scholar]
  • Sars GO. 1922–1928. An Account of the Crustacea of Norway, IX Ostracoda. xii + 1–227. Norway: Bergen Museum. [Google Scholar]
  • Siveter DJ, Briggs DEG, Siveter DJ, Sutton MD, Joomun SC. 2012. A Silurian myodocope with preserved soft-parts: cautioning the interpretation of the shell-based ostracod record. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B 280: 20122664. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.2664. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Siveter DJ, Tanaka G, Farrell ÚC, Martin MJ, Siveter DJ, Briggs DEG. 2014. Exceptionally Preserved 450-Million-Year-Old Ordovician Ostracods with Brood Care. Current Biology 24: 801–806. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sohn IG. 1960. Paleozoic Species of Bairdia and Related Genera. United States. Geological Survey Professional Paper 330-A: iii + 1–105. [Google Scholar]
  • Slipper IJ. 2009a. Upper Cretaceous. In: Whittaker JE, Hart MB, eds. Ostracods in British Stratigraphy, pp. 345–372. The Micropalaeontological Society, Special Publications. London: The Geological Society. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Slipper IJ. 2009b. Marine Lower Cretaceous. In: Whittaker JE, Hart MB, eds. Ostracods in British Stratigraphy, pp. 309–343. The Micropalaeontological Society, Special Publications. London: The Geological Society. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sutton MD, Briggs DEG, Siveter DJ, Siveter DJ. 2001. Methodologies for the visualisation and reconstruction of three-dimensional fossils from the Silurian Herefordshire Lagerstätte. Palaeontologia Electronica 4(1/1): 17. [Google Scholar]
  • Sutton MD, Rahman IA, Garwood RJ. 2014. Techniques for virtual palaeontology. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 208 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Swanson KM. 2012. Bugs in the Ocean. Australia: CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood VIC 3066, 95 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Sylvester-Bradley PC. 1973. The new Palaeontography. A Stereo-Atlas of Ostracod Shells 1(1): 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • Triebel E. 1941. Zur Morphologie und Ökologie der fossilen Ostracoden.mit Beschreibung einiger neuer Gattungen und Arten. Senckenbergiana 23: 294–400. [Google Scholar]
  • Ulrich EO. 1894. The Lower Silurian Ostracoda of Minnesota. The Geology of Minnesota (Final Report, Chapter 7) 3(2): 629–693. [Google Scholar]
  • Whittaker JE, Hart MB, eds. 2009. Ostracods in British Stratigraphy. The Micropalaeontological Society, Special Publications. London: The Geological Society, 485 p. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wrozyna C, Neubauer TA, Meyer J, Piller WE. 2016. Shape variation in Neotropical Cytheridella (Ostracoda) using semilandmarks-based Geometric Morphometrics: A methodological approach and possible biogeographical implications. PLoS ONE 11(12): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168438. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ziegler A, Bock C, Ketten DR, Mair RW, Mueller S, Nagelmann N, et al. 2018. Digital three-dimensional imaging techniques provide new analytical pathways for malacological research. American Malacological Bulletin 36: 248–273. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.