EDP Sciences logo
Soumettre un article
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 197 (2026) BSGF - Earth Sci. Bull., 197 (2026) 16 References
Open Access
Review
Issue
BSGF - Earth Sci. Bull.
Volume 197, 2026
Article Number 16
Number of page(s) 17
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/bsgf/2026007
Published online 29 juillet 2026
  • Allmann BP, Shearer PM, Hauksson E. 2008. Spectral discrimination between quarry blasts and earthquakes in southern California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98(4): 2073–2079. [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson JA, Wood HO. 1925. Description and theory of the torsion seismometer. Bull Seismol Soc Am 15(1): 72. [Google Scholar]
  • ASN - Autorité de sûreté nucléaire. 2001. Règle fondamentale de sûreté RFS 2001-01 : Caractérisation de l’aléa sismique pour la sûreté des installations nucléaires de base. France: ASN. [Google Scholar]
  • Audin L, Avouac JP, Flouzat M, Plantet JL. 2002. Fluid‐driven seismicity in a stable tectonic context: the Remiremont fault zone, Vosges, France. Geophys Res Lett 29(6): 13–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bakun WH, Scotti O. 2006. Regional intensity attenuation models for France and the estimation of magnitude and location of historical earthquakes. Geophys J Int 164: 596–610. [Google Scholar]
  • Begnaud ML, Myers SC, Young BA, Hipp JR, Dodge D, Phillips WS. 2020. Updates to the regional seismic travel time (RSTT) model: 1. Tomography Pure Appl Geophys 24 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02619-5. [Google Scholar]
  • Belinić T, Markušić S. 2017. Empirical criteria for the accuracy of earthquake locations on the Croatian territory. Geofizika 34, https://doi.org/10.15233/gfz.2017.34.5. [Google Scholar]
  • Bennett T, Murphy J. 1986. Analysis of seismic discrimination capabilities using regional data from western United States events. Bull Seismol Soc Am 76(4): 1069–1086. [Google Scholar]
  • Berge-Thierry C, Hollender F, Guyonnet-Benaize C, Baumont D, Ameri G, Bollinger L. 2017. Challenges ahead for nuclear facility site-specific seismic hazard assessment in France: the alternative energies and the Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) vision. In: Best practices in physics-based fault rupture models for seismic hazard assessment of nuclear installations Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 285-309. [Google Scholar]
  • Blaise T, Khoudja SAA, Carpentier C, Brigaud B, Missenard Y, Mangenot X, et al. 2022. Far-field brittle deformation record in the eastern Paris Basin (France). Geol Mag 159(11-12): 2095–2109. [Google Scholar]
  • Blanc E. 1989. Observations in the upper atmosphere of ionospheric irregularities observed by HF soundings over a powerful acoustic source. Radio Sci 24(3): 279–288. [Google Scholar]
  • Bondár I, McLaughlin KL. 2009. A new ground truth data set for seismic studies. Geophys Res Lett 80: 465–472. [Google Scholar]
  • Bondár I, Myers SC, Engdahl ER, Bergman EA. 2004. Epicentre accuracy based on seismic network criteria. Geophys J Int 156: 483–496. [Google Scholar]
  • Bondár I, Storchak D. 2011. Improved location procedures at the International Seismological Centre. Geophys J Int 186: 1220–1244. [Google Scholar]
  • Bondár I, Engdahl R, Villaseñor A, Harris J, Storchak D. 2015. The ISC-GEM global instrumental earthquake catalogue (1900-2009): introduction. Phys Earth Planet Inter. [Google Scholar]
  • Bondár I, Mclaughlin K. 2009. Seismic location bias and uncertainty in the presence of correlated and non-gaussian travel-time errors. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99: 172–193. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120080922. [Google Scholar]
  • Bormann P. (Ed.). 2009. New Manual of Seismological Observatory Practice (NMSOP-1). Potsdam: IASPEI, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences. [Google Scholar]
  • Bourlange S, Mekkawi M, Conin M, Schnegg PA. 2012. Magnetotelluric study of the Remiremont-Epinal-Rambervillers zone of migrating seismicity, Vosges (France). Bull Soc Géol Fr 183(5): 461–470. [Google Scholar]
  • Cara M, Cansi Y, Schlupp A, Arroucau P, Béthoux N, Beucler E, et al. 2015. SI-Hex: a new catalogue of instrumental seismicity for metropolitan France. Bull Soc Géol Fr 186(1): 3–19. [Google Scholar]
  • Cara M, Denieul M, Sèbe O, Delouis B, Cansi Y, Schlupp A. 2017. Magnitude Mw in metropolitan France. J Seismol 21(3): 551–565. [Google Scholar]
  • Cesca S, Stich D, Grigoli F, Vuan A, López-Comino JÁ, Niemz P, et al. 2021. Seismicity at the Castor gas reservoir driven by pore pressure diffusion and asperities loading. Nat Commun 12(1): 4783. [Google Scholar]
  • Chantraine J, Autran A, Cavelier C. 2003. Carte géologique de la France à l’échelle du millionième. Orléans: BRGM. [Google Scholar]
  • Damon A, Mazzotti S, Vernant P, Ego F, Baumont D, Grosset J, et al. 2024. Impact des contraintes induites par les glaciations et l’érosion sur la stabilité des failles du nord de la France. Lettre d'information Epos-France, (2): 12-13. [Google Scholar]
  • Delay J, Salsac MD, Huret E, Dewonck S, Bosgiraud JM, Armand G, WM2020 Conference. 2020. ANDRA’S underground research laboratory in bure: major role in the Cigéo development – 20005. [Google Scholar]
  • Denieul M, Sèbe O, Cara M, Cansi Y. 2015. Mw from crustal coda waves recorded on analog seismograms. Bull Seismol Soc Am 105(2A): 831–849. [Google Scholar]
  • Doubre C, Meghraoui M, Masson F, Lambotte S, Jund H, de Berc MB, et al. 2021. Seismotectonics in Northeastern France and neighboring regions. C R Géosci 353(S1): 153–185. [Google Scholar]
  • Drouet S, Ameri G, Le Dortz K, Secanell R, Senfaute G. 2020. A probabilistic seismic hazard map for the metropolitan France. Bull Earthq Eng 18(5): 1865–1898. [Google Scholar]
  • Duverger C, Mazet-Roux G, Bollinger L, Guilhem-Trilla A, Vallage A, Hernandez B, et al. 2021. A decade of seismicity in metropolitan France (2010-2019): the CEA/LDG methodologies and observations. BSGF - Earth Sciences Bulletin 192: 25. https://doi.org/10.1051/bsgf/2021014. [Google Scholar]
  • Epos-France. 1962. Epos-France Broad-band network (RLBP) [Data set]. Epos-France Seismological Data Centre. https://doi.org/10.15778/RESIF.FR. [Google Scholar]
  • Geiger L. 1912. Probability method for the determination of earthquake Epicenters from the arrival time only. Bull St. Louis Univ 8: 56–71. [Google Scholar]
  • GEOFON Data Centre. 1993. GEOFON Seismic Network. GFZ Data Services. Dataset/Seismic Network. https://doi.org/10.14470/TR560404. [Google Scholar]
  • Got JL, Monteiller V, Guilbert J, Marsan D, Cansi Y, Maillard C, et al. 2011. Strain localization and fluid migration from earthquake relocation and seismicity analysis in the western Vosges (France). Geophys J Int 185(1): 365–384. [Google Scholar]
  • Grigoli F, Cesca S, Priolo E, Rinaldi AP, Clinton JF, Stabile TA, et al. 2017. Current challenges in monitoring, discrimination, and management of induced seismicity related to underground industrial activities: a European perspective. Rev Geophys 55(2): 310–340. [Google Scholar]
  • Guillocheau F, Robin C, Allemand P, Bourquin S, Brault N, Dromart G, et al. 2000. Meso-Cenozoic geodynamic evolution of the Paris Basin: 3D stratigraphic constraints. Geodin Acta 13(4): 189–245. [Google Scholar]
  • Gutenberg B, Richter CF. 1949. Seismicity of the earth and associated phenomena. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Helmholtz-Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences and gempa GmbH. 2008. The SeisComP seismological software package. GFZ Data Services. https://doi.org/10.5880/GFZ.2.4.2020.003. [Google Scholar]
  • Henrion E, Masson F, Doubre C, Ulrich P, Meghraoui M. 2020. Present-day deformation in the Upper Rhine Graben from GNSS data. Geophys J Int 223(1): 599–611. [Google Scholar]
  • Hourcade C, Bonnin M, Beucler E. 2023. New CNN-based tool to discriminate anthropogenic from natural low magnitude seismic events. Geophys J Int 232(3): 2119–2132. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggac441. [Google Scholar]
  • Hutton LK, Boore DM. 1987. The ML scale in Southern California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 77(6): 2074–2094. [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA. 2011. Geological disposal facilities for radioactive waste (IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-14). Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency. [Google Scholar]
  • Jomard H, Cushing EM, Palumbo L, Baize S, David C, Chartier T. 2017. Transposing an active fault database into a seismic hazard fault model for nuclear facilities – Part 1: Building a database of potentially active faults (BDFA) for metropolitan France. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 17: 1573–1584. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kiszely M, Süle B, Mónus P, et al. 2021. Discrimination between local earthquakes and quarry blasts in the Vértes Mountains, Hungary. Acta Geod Geophys 56: 523–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-021-00346-4. [Google Scholar]
  • Larsonnier F, Rouillé G, Bartoli C, Klaus L, Begoff P. 2019. Comparison on seismometer sensitivity following ISO 16063-11 standard. International Congress of Metrology https://doi.org/10.1051/metrology/201927003. [Google Scholar]
  • Légifrance. 2018. “Décret Du 2 Février 2018 Prolongeant La Concession de Stockage Souterrain de Gaz Naturel, Dite “Concession de Cerville - Velaine” (Meurthe-Et-Moselle), à La Société ENGIE SA - Légifrance.” Gouv.fr, 2018, www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000036570395. Accessed 23 May 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • Leverd Pascal-Claude. 2024. The world leading deep geological repository projects: a synthetic description of the high-level waste long-term management facilities programed in Finland, Sweden, France and Switzerland and an overview of the deep geological repository site selection M. J Nucl Fuel Cycle Waste Technol 22(4): 503–522. https://doi.org/10.7733/jnfcwt.2024.040. [Google Scholar]
  • Manchuel K, Traversa P, Baumont D, Cara M, Nayman E, Durouchoux C. 2018. The French seismic CATalogue (FCAT-17). Bull Earthq Eng 16(6): 2227–2251. [Google Scholar]
  • Masson C, Mazzotti S, Vernant P, Doerflinger E. 2019. Extracting small deformation beyond individual station precision from dense Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) networks in France and western Europe. Solid Earth 10(6): 1905–1920. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mayor J, Traversa P, Calvet M, Margerin L. 2018. Tomography of crustal seismic attenuation in Metropolitan France: implications for seismicity analysis. Bull Earthq Eng 16(6): 2195–2210. [Google Scholar]
  • Mazet-Roux G. 2025. 1963-2023 seismicity catalogue of metropolitan France. https://doi.org/10.57932/41bbc272-cb46-438d-a125-9a475077adfd. [Google Scholar]
  • McGarr A, Simpson D, Seeber L. 2002. Case histories of induced and triggered seismicity. In: International geophysics Academic Press, Vol. 81, pp. 647-661. [Google Scholar]
  • Myers SC, Begnaud ML, Ballard S, Pasyanos ME, Phillips WS, Ramirez AL, et al. 2010. A crust and upper mantle model of Eurasia and North Africa for Pn travel time calculation. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100(2): 640–656. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090198. [Google Scholar]
  • Nicolas M, Santoire JP, Delpech PY. 1990. Intraplate seismicity: new seismotectonic data in Western Europe. Tectonophysics 179(1-2): 27–53. [Google Scholar]
  • Nouibat A, Zaroli C, Lambotte S. 2025. Ambient noise imaging of Western Europe from combining linear SOLA Backus–Gilbert inference and non-linear probabilistic approaches. Geophys Res Lett 52: e2025GL115623. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL115623. [Google Scholar]
  • RESIF. 2018. CEA/DASE broad-band permanent network in metropolitan France [Data set]. RESIF - Réseau Sismologique et géodésique Français. https://doi.org/10.15778/RESIF.RD. [Google Scholar]
  • Richter CF. 1958. Elementary seismology. San Francisco, California: W. H. Freeman and Co., 578 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Richter CF. 1935. An instrumental earthquake magnitude scale. Bull Seismol Soc Am 25: 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  • Schultz R, Skoumal RJ, Brudzinski MR, Eaton D, Baptie B, Ellsworth W. 2020. Hydraulic fracturing-induced seismicity. Rev Geophys 58: e2019RG000695. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000695. [Google Scholar]
  • Storengy. 2021. www.storengy.fr/en/our-sites/cerville. Accessed 23 May 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • Storengy. 2023. Storengy press release, https://www.storengy.fr/fr/medias/actualites/storengy-redemarre-son-site-de-stockage-de-trois-fontaines. Accessed 23 May 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • Stump BW, Hedlin MA, Pearson DC, Hsu V. 2002. Characterization of mining explosions at regional distances: implications with the international monitoring system. Rev Geophys 40(4): 2–11. [Google Scholar]
  • Veinante-Delhaye A. and Santoire JP, 1980. Sismicité récente de l’arc sud-armoricain et du nord-ouest du Massif-central. Mécanismes au foyer et tectonique. Bull Soc Géol Fr., (22), 1: 93–102. [Google Scholar]
  • Vilarrasa V, De Simone S, Carrera J, Villaseñor A. 2021. Unraveling the causes of the seismicity induced by underground gas storage at Castor, Spain. Geophys Res Lett 48(7): e2020GL092038. [Google Scholar]
  • Wessel P, Smith WHF. 1998. New, improved version of the generic mapping tools released. EOS Trans AGU 79: 579. [Google Scholar]
  • Wuester J. 1993. Discrimination of chemical explosions and earthquakes in central Europe—a case study. Bull Seismol Soc Am 83: 1184–1212. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.